Security Breach Addressed by Apex Court Judge on May 9
Justice Syed Hasan Zafar Rizvi, a member of the Constitutional Bench (CB) of the apex court, has highlighted a significant security breach that occurred on May 9, 2023. The breach involved rioters trespassing into military installations following the arrest of former Prime Minister Imran Khan. This incident has raised serious concerns about the safety and security of such sensitive locations.
During a recent hearing related to the trial of the rioters involved in the May 9 events, Justice Rizvi directly addressed the lawyers representing the Ministry of Defense. He questioned whether any military personnel had been tried by military courts in connection with the vandalism and destruction that took place that day. The judge expressed disbelief at how individuals managed to breach the security measures in place and reach the Lahore Corps Commander House. He emphasized that such actions constitute a clear security breach that cannot be overlooked.
The counsel for the Ministry of Defense, Khawaja Haris, responded to Justice Rizvi’s inquiries by stating that no military officials faced trial following the incidents of May 9. He further explained that despite the attacks by rioters, authorities exercised extreme restraint to prevent any loss of life. This approach was aimed at maintaining peace and order while dealing with the escalating situation.
**Mastermind Behind the Events**
Justice Rizvi also raised the crucial question of identifying the mastermind or instigator behind the events of May 9. He pressed for answers on who orchestrated the conspiracy that led to the breach of security and the subsequent chaos. Khawaja Haris assured the court that the conspirators or masterminds responsible for these actions would also be brought to justice through military courts. This underscores the commitment to holding all those involved in such criminal activities accountable for their actions.
**Jurisdiction of Military Courts**
During the hearing, other members of the bench, such as Justice Musarrat Hilali and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, raised important questions regarding the jurisdiction of military courts. They sought clarity on how cases involving civilians interacting with soldiers in cantonment areas or incidents like theft of military equipment would be handled. Khawaja Haris provided insightful responses, highlighting the unique legal framework that governs military courts and their role in upholding discipline within military ranks.
As the case continues to unfold, it is evident that the events of May 9 have far-reaching implications that go beyond mere acts of vandalism. The judiciary’s scrutiny of these incidents underscores the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring that security breaches are addressed with the seriousness they deserve. The hearing scheduled for today will likely shed further light on the legal intricacies surrounding this complex case.
